
To equip mining engineers, quarry managers, and plant managers with the precise knowledge needed to make informed decisions, we present a list that enables users to explore, compare, and evaluate over 72+ models of cone crushers.
Best Overall

Metso Nordberg HP Series
The Metso Nordberg HP Series is the ultimate choice for efficient, reliable, and high-performing cone crushing worldwide.
Best Capacity

Metso Nordberg MP2500
The Metso Nordberg MP2500 stands as the unrivaled, colossal cone crusher with its immense processing capacity of 7,166 mtph.
Best Efficiency

Terex TGS420
The Terex TGS420 showcases exceptional efficiency, demanding only 315 kW of power with a processing capacity of 1050 mtph.
Best Capacity Cone Crushers
When it comes to cone crushers, one key factor stands out: capacity.
The ability to process larger volumes of material not only increases throughput but also improves overall operational efficiency.
Let’s get started with the top 5 largest capacity models.
1. Metso Nordberg MP2500 (7,166 mtph)
The Metso Nordberg MP2500 stands as the largest capacity cone crusher, surpassing its competitors by a significant margin.
Metso Nordberg MP2500 | Specs |
---|---|
Max Capacity | 7,166 mtph / 7,899 stph |
Power | |
CSS Range | 19 – 63 mm / 0.7 – 2.5 in |
Weight | 450,000 kg / 992,080 lbs |
Max Feed |

The Nordberg® MP2500™ cone crusher, known as the world’s largest, offers high capacity, energy efficiency, and reliable performance through features such as automated tramp release, hydraulic clearing system, and push-button maintenance.
Visit Metso.com
2. FLSmidth Raptor 2500 (3,502 mtph)
The FLSmidth Raptor 2500 delivers a substantial capacity of 3502 mtph, providing a strong and reliable solution for demanding applications.
FLSmidth Raptor 2500 | Specs |
---|---|
Max Capacity | 3,502 mtph / 3,860 stph |
Power | 1,860 kW / 2,490 hp |
CSS Range | 13 – 45 mm / 0.5 – 1.8 in |
Weight | 401,089 kg / 884,250 lbs |
Max Feed | 450 mm / 17.7 in |

The Raptor 2500 is FLSmidth’s largest cone crusher model, featuring robust construction, fail-safe hydraulics, and advanced technology such as double-acting tramp release and clearing hydraulic cylinder, offering maximum capacity and reliable crushing action for mining operations.
Visit flsmidth.com
3. Metso Nordberg MP1250 (3,025 mtph)
With a capacity of 3025 mtph, the Metso Nordberg MP1250 offers a formidable crushing power that ensures efficient operations in mining and aggregates.
Metso Nordberg MP1250 | Specs |
---|---|
Max Capacity | 3,025 mtph / 3,334 stph |
Power | |
CSS Range | 10 – 50 mm / 0.4 – 2 in |
Weight | 153,985 kg / 339,480 lbs |
Max Feed |

The Nordberg MP1250 cone crusher provides exceptional benefits such as high capacity, efficient crushing, and reduced downtime with its advanced features including increased crushing force, optimized head motion, robust construction with superior bronze bushings, and a wide feed opening; compared to the Nordberg MP2500, it offers similar benefits but with a smaller feed opening and slightly lower capacity.
Visit Metso.com
4. Metso Nordberg MP1000 (2,420 mtph)
The Metso Nordberg MP1000 offers a robust capacity of 2420 mtph, making it a competitive choice for high-capacity crushing requirements.
Metso Nordberg MP1000 | Specs |
---|---|
Max Capacity | 2,420 mtph / 2,668 stph |
Power | |
CSS Range | 13 – 50 mm / 0.5 – 2 in |
Weight | 153,124 kg / 337,580 lbs |
Max Feed |

The Nordberg MP1000 cone crusher offers notable benefits including high capacity, efficient crushing, and improved maintenance accessibility with features like advanced automation, optimized head motion, increased power draw, and a robust design; compared to the Nordberg MP1250, it has a slightly lower capacity and power draw, but still provides excellent performance and reliability.
Visit Metso.com
5. Terex TG1020 (2,300 mtph)
The Terex TG1020 showcases a commendable capacity of 2300 mtph, providing a reliable and efficient solution for the mining and aggregate industries.
Terex TG1020 | Specs |
---|---|
Max Capacity | 2,300 mtph / 2,535 stph |
Power | 750 kW / 1,010 hp |
CSS Range | 13 – 70 mm / 0.5 – 2.8 in |
Weight | 77,000 kg / 169,760 kg |
Max Feed | 355 mm / 14 in |

The TGS Series cones, designed for large feed secondary applications, provide epic durability, unmatched reliability, and optimum efficiency, with a larger feed size capacity, steep angled head design for increased throughput, and minimal reduction in maximum feed size throughout the wear life of the liners.
Visit Terex.com
Summary of the Largest Cone Crushers
By examining the data presented in the table, you can evaluate the performance capabilities of each model, understand their power requirements, determine the range of particle sizes they can handle, and consider the weight implications for transportation and installation.
This comparison aids in making informed decisions about which model to choose based on factors such as desired production capacity, operational efficiency, and site-specific constraints.
Model | Metso Nordberg MP2500 | FLSmidth Raptor 2500 | Metso Nordberg MP1250 | Metso Nordberg MP1000 | Terex TG1020 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Max Capacity (mtph) | 7,166 | 3,502 | 3,025 | 2,420 | 2,300 |
Power (kW) | 1,860 | 750 | |||
CSS Range (mm) | 19 – 63 | 13 – 45 | 10 – 50 | 13 – 50 | 13 – 70 |
Weight (kg) | 450,000 | 401,089 | 153,985 | 153,124 | 77,000 |
Max Feed (mm) | 450 | 355 |
Sort and Filter Through 72+ Cone Crushers
wdt_ID | Model | Company | Weight | Power | Max Feed | Min Capacity | Max Capacity | Min CSS | Max CSS |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Nordberg MP2500 | Metso | 450,000 | 0 | 0 | 1,560 | 7,166 | 19 | 63 |
2 | Nordberg MP1250 | Metso | 153,985 | 0 | 0 | 590 | 3,025 | 10 | 50 |
3 | Nordberg MP1000 | Metso | 153,124 | 0 | 0 | 615 | 2,420 | 13 | 50 |
4 | Nordberg MP800 | Metso | 120,570 | 0 | 0 | 495 | 1,935 | 13 | 50 |
5 | TGS420 | Terex | 36,500 | 315 | 385 | 0 | 1,050 | 38 | 70 |
6 | TG1020 | Terex | 77,000 | 750 | 355 | 0 | 2,300 | 13 | 70 |
7 | CS660 | Sandvik | 40,254 | 315 | 622 | 314 | 908 | 29 | 83 |
8 | Nordberg HP900 | Metso | 77,960 | 700 | 356 | 0 | 2,000 | 9 | 32 |
9 | Nordberg GP100S | Metso | 7,700 | 90 | 236 | 80 | 250 | 20 | 45 |
10 | TG820 | Terex | 50,000 | 600 | 320 | 0 | 1,550 | 13 | 64 |
wdt_ID | Model | Company | Weight | Power | Max Feed | Min Capacity | Max Capacity | Min CSS | Max CSS |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Nordberg MP2500 | Metso | 992,080 | 0 | 0.00 | 1,720 | 7,899 | 0.70 | 2.50 |
2 | Nordberg MP1250 | Metso | 339,480 | 0 | 0.00 | 650 | 3,334 | 0.40 | 2.00 |
3 | Nordberg MP1000 | Metso | 337,580 | 0 | 0.00 | 678 | 2,668 | 0.50 | 2.00 |
4 | Nordberg MP800 | Metso | 265,810 | 0 | 0.00 | 546 | 2,133 | 0.50 | 2.00 |
5 | TGS420 | Terex | 80,470 | 420 | 15.20 | 0 | 1,157 | 1.50 | 2.80 |
6 | TG1020 | Terex | 169,760 | 1,010 | 14.00 | 0 | 2,535 | 0.50 | 2.80 |
7 | CS660 | Sandvik | 88,740 | 420 | 24.50 | 346 | 1,001 | 1.10 | 3.30 |
8 | Nordberg HP900 | Metso | 171,870 | 940 | 14.00 | 0 | 2,205 | 0.40 | 1.30 |
9 | Nordberg GP100S | Metso | 16,980 | 120 | 9.30 | 88 | 276 | 0.80 | 1.80 |
10 | TG820 | Terex | 110,230 | 800 | 12.60 | 0 | 1,709 | 0.50 | 2.50 |
Are we missing a cone crusher? Leave a comment or contact us https://proguideroller.com/contact
Frequently Asked Questions
The Closed Side Setting (CSS) Range in cone crusher applications refers to the minimum and maximum distance between the concave and mantle surfaces of the crusher chamber. It directly affects the crushing efficiency and particle size distribution.
When the CSS is set to a smaller value, the crusher chamber becomes narrower, resulting in a finer product with a smaller particle size. This is desirable for applications requiring a higher degree of precision or specific particle sizes. However, a smaller CSS may decrease the throughput capacity and increase the wear on the crusher components.
Conversely, a larger CSS allows for a wider crusher chamber, leading to a coarser product with a larger particle size. This can be advantageous in certain applications where a coarser product is acceptable or when higher throughput is desired. However, a larger CSS might sacrifice some precision in particle size control.
Optimizing the CSS range involves finding the right balance between the desired particle size distribution, crushing efficiency, and throughput capacity. It is often determined through practical experience and can be influenced by factors such as the feed material characteristics, crusher design, and operating conditions.
The units mtph and stph, commonly used in cone crusher applications within the aggregate and mining industries, are measurements of the crusher's throughput capacity.
mtph stands for metric tonnes per hour, and it represents the amount of material that a cone crusher can process in metric tonnes within a one-hour time frame. For instance, a cone crusher with a throughput capacity of 200 mtph can process 200 metric tonnes of material in one hour.
On the other hand, stph stands for short tons per hour, which is the imperial counterpart to mtph. It measures the same concept but in short tons, which are commonly used in the United States. One short ton is equivalent to 0.907 metric tonnes.
These units, mtph and stph, are essential for understanding and comparing the capacity and productivity of cone crushers in the aggregate and mining industries. They help stakeholders gauge the crusher's ability to handle different material volumes and make informed decisions based on the desired production requirements.
The reduction ratio measures the extent to which a crusher can reduce the size of the feed material compared to the size of the crushed product, with a higher ratio indicating a more efficient crushing process for easier handling, transport, and further processing in the aggregate and mining industries. It is calculated by dividing the feed material size by the product size and can vary depending on factors such as initial size distribution and crusher design, often requiring multiple crushing stages to achieve the desired ratio.
In cone crushers, the stroke refers to the vertical movement of the crushing mantle relative to the concave. Three stroke options are commonly used: short stroke, medium stroke, and long stroke. A short stroke provides finer product size control, ideal for tertiary crushing, while a long stroke enables the crusher to process larger feed sizes and achieve higher throughput. The medium stroke strikes a balance between the two, offering a moderate product size distribution for secondary crushing applications.
The stroke directly impacts the crusher's capacity, power consumption, and particle shape. A longer stroke generally increases throughput but may consume more power. Conversely, a shorter stroke allows for precise control over the particle size but might sacrifice some capacity. The stroke options vary depending on the cone crusher model and manufacturer, and adjusting the stroke typically involves changing the eccentric throw. Selecting the appropriate stroke option involves considering factors such as desired product size range, feed size distribution, crusher design, and operating conditions.